X-Original-To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Received: from localhost (developer.postgresql.org [64.117.224.193]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B08925036 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 05:51:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (developer.postgresql.org [64.117.224.193:10024]) (amavisd-new) with ESMTP id 86110-04 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 05:51:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from station1.osa.org (rdu57-84-123.nc.rr.com [66.57.84.123]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0670E924FA1 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 05:51:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by station1.osa.org (Postfix on SuSE Linux 8.1 (i686)) with ESMTP id 8053ABA4 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 06:03:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Stuart Reply-To: sfbarbee@yahoo.com To: Subject: Inheritance and Referencial Integrity Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 06:03:41 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200305280603.42070.sfbarbee@yahoo.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Archive-Number: 200305/536 X-Sequence-Number: 13701 I'm using 7.3.2 which extends the inheritance of some checks and triggers to inherited tables, but still falls short of foreign key referencees looking into child tables. Are there plans to address these defficencies and when might we see this take place. Thanks Stuart