Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 14:21:33 +0200
From: David Pradier <dpradier@apartia.fr>
To: Christoph Haller <ch@rodos.fzk.de>, pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: How to make a IN without a table... ?
Message-ID: <20030612122133.GD680@apartia.fr>
Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Haller <ch@rodos.fzk.de>, pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
References: <3EE8610A.EBE8B77@rodos.fzk.de> <20030612115027.GB680@apartia.fr>
	<20030612120929.GC1285@wolff.to>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030612120929.GC1285@wolff.to>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 07:09:29AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 13:50:27 +0200,
>   David Pradier <dpradier@apartia.fr> wrote:
> > 
> > I guess i wasn't clear enough.
> > "my_function" here is a function which calculate some results about some
> > datas from the database.
> > Example : a function which would calculate the sum of the money (which
> > would be stored in the database by movement, ie amount + date + cause +
> > account) spent by user my_var1 during period my_var2.
> > 
> > So no, perl can't do this.
> 
> I think the idea was that perl could generate multiple query statements
> for you. This would be slower than doing as one query, but if the database
> is local there wouldn't be much difference.

Hmmm yes...
I'll try this too, good idea :-)

David

-- 
dpradier@apartia.fr 01.46.47.21.33