X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3288CD1B4EF for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 18:48:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [64.117.224.130]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00913-09 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:48:29 -0300 (ADT) Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (unknown [209.128.84.228]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35173D1B587 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:48:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [63.195.55.98] (HELO spooky) by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.2) with ESMTP id 3691977; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:48:50 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Josh Berkus Organization: Aglio Database Solutions To: Tom Lane , Joe Conway Subject: Re: Mystery function error Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:47:41 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: Richard Sydney-Smith , pgsql-sql@postgresql.org References: <000c01c38572$73c03c50$251a32d2@athlon2000> <9634.1064767690@sss.pgh.pa.us> <10187.1064773754@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <10187.1064773754@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200309281147.41146.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200309/364 X-Sequence-Number: 15342 Tom, > position() 1 usec/call 1 usec/call > SQL func 1 usec/call 90 usec/call > plpgsql func 110 usec/call 100 usec/call Hmmm ... this does still seem to show that plpgsql is 10% slower in 7.4. Any idea why? -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco