X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2117ED1B554 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 19:42:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79567-04 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:42:16 -0300 (ADT) Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (unknown [209.128.84.228]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EAFD1B4F8 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:42:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [66.219.92.2] (HELO temoku) by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.2) with ESMTP id 3807499; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:42:51 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Josh Berkus Reply-To: josh@agliodbs.com Organization: Aglio Database Solutions To: Tom Lane , Michael Glaesmann Subject: Re: Expressional Indexes Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:39:58 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org References: <7141E2A2-04BE-11D8-81AE-0005029FC1A7@myrealbox.com> <18109.1066850278@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <18109.1066850278@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200310221239.58302.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200310/290 X-Sequence-Number: 15690 Tom, Jumping lists, NOVICE is unlikely to have an opinion about this. > I'm not particularly happy with the phrase "expressional index", and > would like to think of something else to use before the 7.4 docs go > final. Any ideas? Hmmm ... well, actually, I like "Expressional Indexes". What's wrong with = it? --=20 -Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco