X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890ABD1D997
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 18 Nov 2003 14:47:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 44236-06
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:47:30 -0400 (AST)
Received: from wolff.to (wolff.to [66.93.249.74])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9E20D1D9D9
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:47:25 -0400 (AST)
Received: (qmail 32266 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2003 14:45:57 -0000
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:45:57 -0600
From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>
To: Troels Arvin <troels@arvin.dk>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Quota query with decent performance?
Message-ID: <20031118144557.GB32105@wolff.to>
Mail-Followup-To: Troels Arvin <troels@arvin.dk>,
	pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
References: <pan.2003.11.11.22.58.08.758402@arvin.dk>
	<Pine.BSO.4.44.0311111832190.19584-100000@detroit.arbor.net>
	<pan.2003.11.17.22.55.52.997736@arvin.dk>
	<20031118125642.GC30809@wolff.to>
	<pan.2003.11.18.14.21.43.529784@arvin.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <pan.2003.11.18.14.21.43.529784@arvin.dk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200311/215
X-Sequence-Number: 16030

On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 15:21:43 +0100,
  Troels Arvin <troels@arvin.dk> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 06:56:42 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> 
> [...]
> > where not isfalse (age <=
> [...]
> 
> Strange. I can't find the ISFALSE in neither PostgreSQL or standard SQL
> documentation. How can that be?

I forgot to mention that the is false operator is described under
the section on comparison operators.