X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 730E4D1E11A; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 22:42:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27698-04; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 18:42:15 -0400 (AST) Received: from davinci.ethosmedia.com (server228.ethosmedia.com [209.128.84.228]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26F8D1E104; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 18:42:13 -0400 (AST) Received: from [63.195.55.98] (HELO spooky) by davinci.ethosmedia.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 4742433; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 14:43:35 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Josh Berkus Organization: Aglio Database Solutions To: Tom Lane Subject: Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 14:41:22 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org, pgsql-sql@postgresql.org References: <200403302050.12415.josh@agliodbs.com> <29096.1080710306@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <29096.1080710306@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200403311441.22936.josh@agliodbs.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200403/150 X-Sequence-Number: 3969 Tom, > This looks more like an underling with a checklist than a serious > inquiry. Can you get them to specify particular capabilities that they > need? In sufficient detail that we could actually answer? Ok, talked with him. They are trying to plan OO-->DB mapping in 3 programming languages for a large project. Large enough that they would cost out implementing these SQL99 features for us if they like PostgreSQL otherwise. But they *do* need to complete the checklist for each candidate database system. So ... can anyone more familiar with SQL99 than me give some feedback? -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco