X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C8EB4D1ED6A; Sat,  3 Apr 2004 23:26:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 86519-09; Sat,  3 Apr 2004 19:26:24 -0400 (AST)
Received: from curie.credativ.org (credativ.com [217.160.209.18])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C100AD1ED6E; Sat,  3 Apr 2004 19:26:07 -0400 (AST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by curie.credativ.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F113055EFC; Sun,  4 Apr 2004 01:26:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from colt.pezone.net (dsl-082-082-236-090.arcor-ip.net
	[82.82.236.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by curie.credativ.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6965055BEB; Sun,  4 Apr 2004 01:26:26 +0200 (CEST)
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: josh@agliodbs.com, pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org, pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 01:26:25 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1
References: <200403302050.12415.josh@agliodbs.com>
In-Reply-To: <200403302050.12415.josh@agliodbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200404040126.25628.peter_e@gmx.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS at credativ.com
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200404/20
X-Sequence-Number: 3992

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Just got this "do we support it" questionnaire from a signficant
> commercial entity vaguely interested in supporting PostrgreSQL.   
> Since I'm often foggy on the differences between the SQL99 and SQL92
> spec definitions of things, I thought I'd post it for feedback here:

The list of supported features can be found here: 
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/features.html