X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C69D8D1D26A
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 22 Apr 2004 06:56:48 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 77790-04
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 22 Apr 2004 06:56:49 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from web12706.mail.yahoo.com (web12706.mail.yahoo.com
	[216.136.173.243])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 275AFD1D09C
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 06:56:46 -0300 (ADT)
Message-ID: <20040422095648.88816.qmail@web12706.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [194.152.216.133] by web12706.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Thu, 22 Apr 2004 02:56:48 PDT
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 02:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: <ogjunk-pgjedan@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Order by YYYY MM DD in reverse chrono order trouble
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <40868AA4.2070501@onesystem.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.8 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,
	RCVD_IN_DSBL, RCVD_IN_NJABL, RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY, RCVD_IN_SORBS,
	RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Archive-Number: 200404/225
X-Sequence-Number: 17600

Hello,

I'd love to be able to do that, but I cannot just ORDER BY uu.add_date,
because I do not have uu.add_date in the SELECT part of the statement. 
The reason I don't have it there is because I need distinct YYYY MM DD
values back.
Is there a trick that I could use to make this more elegant?

Thanks,
Otis


--- Edmund Bacon <ebacon@onesystem.com> wrote:
> Is there some reason you can't do this:
> 
> SELECT DISTINCT
>   date_part('year', uu.add_date),  date_part('month', uu.add_date), 
>   date_part('day', uu.add_date)
> 
>   FROM uus INNER JOIN ui ON uus.user_id=ui.id INNER JOIN uu ON
>   ui.id=uu.user_id
>   WHERE uus.x_id=1
> 
>   ORDER BY 
> 	uu.add_date DESC;
> 
> This might be faster, as you only have to sort on one field, and I
> think it should give the desired results
> 
> ogjunk-pgjedan@yahoo.com wrote:
> 
> >Hello,
> >
> >I am trying to select distinct dates and order them in the reverse
> >chronological order.  Although the column type is TIMESTAMP, in this
> >case I want only YYYY, MM, and DD back.
> >
> >I am using the following query, but it's not returning dates back in
> >the reverse chronological order:
> >
> >SELECT DISTINCT
> >  date_part('year', uu.add_date),  date_part('month', uu.add_date), 
> >  date_part('day', uu.add_date)
> >
> >FROM uus INNER JOIN ui ON uus.user_id=ui.id INNER JOIN uu ON
> >ui.id=uu.user_id
> >WHERE uus.x_id=1
> >
> >ORDER BY
> >date_part('year', uu.add_date), date_part('month', uu.add_date), 
> >date_part('day',  uu.add_date) DESC;
> >
> >
> >This is what the above query returns:
> >
> > date_part | date_part | date_part
> >-----------+-----------+-----------
> >      2004 |         2 |         6
> >      2004 |         4 |        20
> >(2 rows)
> >
> >
> >I am trying to get back something like this:
> >2004 4 20
> >2004 4 19
> >2004 2 6
> >...
> >
> >My query is obviously wrong, but I can't see the mistake.  I was
> >wondering if anyone else can see it.  Just changing DESC to ASC, did
> >not work.
> >
> >Thank you!
> >Otis
> >
> >
> >---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> >TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> >    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to
> majordomo@postgresql.org)
> >  
> >
> 
> -- 
> Edmund Bacon <ebacon@onesystem.com>
>