X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96F9D1B75C for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:29:07 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44771-07 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 18:28:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web50002.mail.yahoo.com (web50002.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.17]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7275CD1B2BD for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:28:56 -0300 (ADT) Message-ID: <20040625182856.65452.qmail@web50002.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.65.137.210] by web50002.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 13:28:56 CDT Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 13:28:56 -0500 (CDT) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Jaime=20Casanova?= Subject: Re: feature request ? To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <40DBEEB0.40203@archonet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-352566824-1088188136=:65317" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30, HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200406/264 X-Sequence-Number: 18209 --0-352566824-1088188136=:65317 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi all, I ask: "why not to disallow nulls in boolean fields?". It was a question not a proposal. The explanation was clear to me. Nulls are not values but the absence of a known value. It is comparable to the state of a c (or almost any other programming language) variable that had not been initialized. It is not a matter to disallw it, because is implicit in the nature of the programming languages. Am i right? (Maybe my english is not perfect, is not my mother tongue but a lerned one.) Thanx in advance, Jaime Casanova Richard Huxton wrote: Umm - what proposal? Umm - who is suggesting prohibiting nulls? I've re-read the entire thread and can't find any such suggestion. Is this one of those occasions where the different dialects of English are causing confusion? -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd --------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? Todo lo que quieres saber de Estados Unidos, América Latina y el resto del Mundo. Visíta Yahoo! Noticias. --0-352566824-1088188136=:65317 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi all,
 
I ask: "why not to disallow nulls in boolean fields?". It was a question not a proposal.
The explanation was clear to me. Nulls are not values but the absence of a known value.
 
It is comparable to the state of a c (or almost any other programming language) variable that had not been initialized. It is not a matter to disallw it, because is implicit in the nature of the programming languages. Am i right?
 
(Maybe my english is not perfect, is not my mother tongue but a lerned one.)
 
 
Thanx in advance,
Jaime Casanova

Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com> wrote:
Umm - what proposal?

Umm - who is suggesting prohibiting nulls? I've re-read the entire
thread and can't find any such suggestion. Is this one of those
occasions where the different dialects of English are causing confusion?

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd



Do You Yahoo!?
Todo lo que quieres saber de Estados Unidos, América Latina y el resto del Mundo.
Visíta Yahoo! Noticias.
--0-352566824-1088188136=:65317--