X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98E7D1B18A for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:34:28 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01160-10 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:34:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rock.spider.ru (rock.spider.ru [62.183.34.226]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A73E0D1B182 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:34:05 -0300 (ADT) Received: from rock (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rock (Postfix) with SMTP id DEFA12739D for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 16:34:08 +0400 (MSD) Received: from sad.localnet.ru (sad.localnet.ru [10.0.0.72]) by rock.spider.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D3327383 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 16:34:08 +0400 (MSD) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: sad Organization: IT To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: ? on announcement of 7.5 Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:42:13 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200407211542.13682.sad@bankir.ru> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200407/148 X-Sequence-Number: 18400 Hello can anyone comment the announcement of 7.5 about "nested transactions" ? doesn't the nesting hurt the matter of transaction ?