X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9542014B281D for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 23:07:29 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59178-07 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 02:07:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wolff.to (wolff.to [66.93.249.74]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 985DA14B2867 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 23:07:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 23557 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2004 02:15:31 -0000 Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 21:15:31 -0500 From: Bruno Wolff III To: Joe Conway Cc: Kenneth Gonsalves , pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: reply to setting Message-ID: <20040812021531.GA22747@wolff.to> Mail-Followup-To: Joe Conway , Kenneth Gonsalves , pgsql-sql@postgresql.org References: <0408070933080K.01190@thenilgiris.com> <20040811191321.GA14350@wolff.to> <411A8561.8060006@joeconway.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <411A8561.8060006@joeconway.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200408/103 X-Sequence-Number: 18600 On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 13:45:21 -0700, Joe Conway wrote: > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > >The duplication is needless. Direct replies very often get to the recipient > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > is *not* needless? Yeah, I made a typo.