X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DED232AE1F for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 20:23:25 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37459-03 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 19:23:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A55232A6BC for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 18:41:32 +0100 (BST) Received: (qmail 12591 invoked by uid 65534); 2 Oct 2004 17:41:31 -0000 Received: from dsl-213-023-250-118.arcor-ip.net (EHLO colt.pezone.net) (213.23.250.118) by mail.gmx.net (mp021) with SMTP; 02 Oct 2004 19:41:31 +0200 X-Authenticated: #495269 From: Peter Eisentraut To: Tom Lane , Bruno Wolff III Subject: Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd timestamp index possible?) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 19:41:29 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org References: <13492.1096656574@sss.pgh.pa.us> <15677.1096671183@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <15677.1096671183@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410021941.30084.peter_e@gmx.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200410/35 X-Sequence-Number: 59538 Tom Lane wrote: > What I'm inclined to do with these is change pg_proc.h but not force > an initdb. Does anyone want to argue for an initdb to force it to be > fixed in 8.0? We've lived with the wrong labelings for some time now > without noticing, so it doesn't seem like a serious enough bug to > force a post-beta initdb ... to me anyway. I'd prefer if all users of 8.0 were guaranteed to have the same catalog. I don't want to ask users, "what version, and when did you last initdb". We're still in beta; no one purchased any stability guarantees. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/