X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80603329F8C for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:55:13 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22867-05 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:55:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wolff.to (wolff.to [66.93.249.74]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2854B329E76 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:55:07 +0100 (BST) Received: (qmail 3713 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2004 16:05:41 -0000 Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:05:41 -0500 From: Bruno Wolff III To: David Siegal Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Aggregate Function with Argument Message-ID: <20041018160541.GA32433@wolff.to> Mail-Followup-To: David Siegal , pgsql-sql@postgresql.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200410/111 X-Sequence-Number: 19214 On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 11:24:33 -0400, David Siegal wrote: > > My problem is I don't see how to make aggregated_concat accept an > optional delimiter argument. > Maybe it's not possible? > > Any ideas? > Is there some completely different approach I should consider for > concatenating grouped values? This exact same question has been asked previously and should be in the archives. My memory was that there currently isn't a way to pass the delimiter as an argument, but I don't remember whether or not any work arounds were suggested.