X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348FA3A2D50 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 06:12:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15878-08 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 06:12:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rock.spider.ru (rock.spider.ru [62.183.34.226]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C65BE3A1D98 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 06:12:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rock (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rock (Postfix) with SMTP id D8651274DC; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:12:29 +0300 (MSK) Received: from sad.localnet.ru (sad.localnet.ru [10.0.0.72]) by rock.spider.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20A5273FA; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:12:28 +0300 (MSK) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: sad Organization: IT To: Theodore Petrosky , Andrei Bintintan , pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: A transaction in transaction? Possible? Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:23:02 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <20041109152458.51487.qmail@web41007.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20041109152458.51487.qmail@web41007.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200411100923.02316.sad@bankir.ru> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200411/97 X-Sequence-Number: 19416 On Tuesday 09 November 2004 18:24, Theodore Petrosky wrote: > I thought nested transactions are available in the new > release (8) coming up. how to commit/rollback them ?