X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700C53A4352 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:02:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15520-03 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:01:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tigger.fuhr.org (tigger.fuhr.org [63.214.45.158]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E1E3A438F for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:01:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from winnie.fuhr.org (winnie.fuhr.org [10.1.0.1]) by tigger.fuhr.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0JH1khu005401 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:01:48 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from mfuhr@winnie.fuhr.org) Received: from winnie.fuhr.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winnie.fuhr.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0JH1kij095190; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:01:46 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from mfuhr@winnie.fuhr.org) Received: (from mfuhr@localhost) by winnie.fuhr.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j0JH1kJU095189; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:01:46 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from mfuhr) Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:01:46 -0700 From: Michael Fuhr To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=D6PFERL?= Robert Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Returning a bool on DELETE in a proc. Message-ID: <20050119170146.GA95148@winnie.fuhr.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.003 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200501/149 X-Sequence-Number: 19937 On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 11:24:26AM +0100, KÖPFERL Robert wrote: > Seems that I forgot to mention that this function is intended to be written > in SQL, not in PL/SQL. Why SQL instead of PL/pgSQL if the former doesn't do what you need and the latter does? -- Michael Fuhr http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/