X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E748B9B24 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 00:33:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77209-09 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 00:33:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from megazone.bigpanda.com (unknown [64.147.171.210]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECD88B9B26 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 00:33:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: by megazone.bigpanda.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3CE3C3582A; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:32:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by megazone.bigpanda.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF873561A; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:32:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:32:02 -0800 (PST) From: Stephan Szabo To: Don Drake Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: plpgsql functions and NULLs In-Reply-To: <6c21003b05013114272504d72e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20050131162845.K27545@megazone.bigpanda.com> References: <6c21003b0501301141234c256b@mail.gmail.com> <20050131132701.G12960@megazone.bigpanda.com> <6c21003b05013114272504d72e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.009 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200502/1 X-Sequence-Number: 20112 On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Don Drake wrote: > You learn something new everyday. I've never seen that syntax before, > and it works like a charm!! Actually, now that I think about it, I wonder if that's a good thing to use because I don't think that'll use indexes to do the search. You may want to do some testing to see how it runs for you. > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:31:34 -0800 (PST), Stephan Szabo > wrote: > > > > On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Don Drake wrote: > > > > > OK, I have a function that finds records that changed in a set of > > > tables and attempts to insert them into a data warehouse. > > > > > > There's a large outer loop of candidate rows and I inspect them to see > > > if the values really changed before inserting. > > > > > > My problem is that when I look to see if the row exists in the > > > warehouse already, based on some IDs, it fails when an ID is NULL. > > > The ID is nullable, so that's not a problem. > > > > > > But I'm forced to write an IF statement looking for the potential NULL > > > and write 2 queries: > > > > > > IF omcr_id is null > > > select * from .... > > > WHERE omcr_id is NULL > > > AND ... > > > ELSE > > > select * from .... > > > WHERE omcr_id=candidate.omcr_id > > > AND .... > > > END IF; > > > > Hmm, perhaps some form like: > > > > WHERE not(candidate.omcr_id is distinct from omcr_id)