X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA45558AC for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 08:17:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 68777-04 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 08:17:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tigger.fuhr.org (tigger.fuhr.org [63.214.45.158]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90A552A62 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 08:17:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from winnie.fuhr.org (winnie.fuhr.org [10.1.0.1]) by tigger.fuhr.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j228HPgx002164 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 2 Mar 2005 01:17:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from mfuhr@winnie.fuhr.org) Received: from winnie.fuhr.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winnie.fuhr.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j228HO5Q047979; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 01:17:24 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from mfuhr@winnie.fuhr.org) Received: (from mfuhr@localhost) by winnie.fuhr.org (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j228HOPS047978; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 01:17:24 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from mfuhr) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 01:17:24 -0700 From: Michael Fuhr To: mauro Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Postgres performance Message-ID: <20050302081724.GC47871@winnie.fuhr.org> References: <421D8ABC.2030601@archonet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.003 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200503/14 X-Sequence-Number: 20493 On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 02:52:31AM -0800, mauro wrote: > select_range_key2 8922 4 > select_range_prefix 8905 4 > update_of_primary_key_many_keys 2049 5 These look suspect, especially the first two, and they account for over 78% of the total. Do you know what the table definitions and queries look like? -- Michael Fuhr http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/