X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A695363E for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:33:39 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20395-08 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:33:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.80]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A751C535CA for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 20:33:32 +0100 (BST) Received: from unknown (HELO phlogiston.dydns.org) (a.sullivan@rogers.com@216.75.167.195 with login) by smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Apr 2005 19:33:34 -0000 Received: by phlogiston.dydns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 122843F9C; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:33:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:33:33 -0400 From: Andrew Sullivan To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: getting count for a specific querry Message-ID: <20050408193333.GA28225@phlogiston.dyndns.org> References: <1112983840.20921.77.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> <003b01c53c70$6ff184b0$797ba8c0@jfradkin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <003b01c53c70$6ff184b0$797ba8c0@jfradkin> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.05 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200504/113 X-Sequence-Number: 21006 On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 03:23:25PM -0400, Joel Fradkin wrote: > Believe me I just spent two months converting our app, I do not wish to give > our queries run much slower on postgres. As mentioned I purchased a 4 proc I suspect you want the -performance list. And it'd be real handy to get some EXPLAIN ANALYSE results for the offending queries in order to help you (where "handy" is read as "necessary"). A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca Information security isn't a technological problem. It's an economics problem. --Bruce Schneier