X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9548552865 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2005 14:00:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 60554-03 for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2005 17:00:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wolff.to (wolff.to [66.93.197.194]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AB125285C for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2005 14:00:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail 8077 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2005 17:00:26 -0000 Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 12:00:26 -0500 From: Bruno Wolff III To: Din Adrian Cc: Zac , pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Help on Procedure running external function Message-ID: <20050704170026.GA6117@wolff.to> Mail-Followup-To: Bruno Wolff III , Din Adrian , Zac , pgsql-sql@postgresql.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.007 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200507/17 X-Sequence-Number: 21995 On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 16:10:03 -0700, Din Adrian wrote: > > Yes , I know what sequence is, but our procedure for generating doc > numbers is v. big and has manny (4) parameters and we did'nt use sequence > in it for this reason .... Then use a sequence for part of the number.