X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE84D7E2C for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 12:12:42 -0400 (AST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 97720-03 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 16:12:40 +0000 (GMT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from 137086.vserver.de (vs137086.vserver.de [62.75.137.86]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361DBD72C3 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 12:12:38 -0400 (AST) Received: from a-kretschmer.de (p54B39330.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.179.147.48]) (authenticated bits=0) by 137086.vserver.de (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jAKGCZuk007266 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 17:12:36 +0100 Received: from kretschmer by a-kretschmer.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1EdrsR-00014C-00 for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 17:17:15 +0100 Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 17:17:15 +0100 From: Andreas Kretschmer To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Is it possible to redirect an update/insert/delete to a different table? Message-ID: <20051120161715.GA2832@kaufbach.delug.de> References: <200511201207.01114.peter_e@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-OS: Debian/GNU Linux - weil ich es mir Wert bin! X-GPG-Fingerprint: EE16 3C01 7B9C 10F7 2C8B 3B86 4DB3 D9EE 7F45 84DA X-Message-Flag: "Windows" is not the answer. "Windows" is the question and the answer is "no"! X-Lugdd: Gerd Kube X-Info: My name is root. Just root. And I am licensed to kill -9 User-Agent: mutt-ng 1.5.9i (Linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000] X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200511/171 X-Sequence-Number: 23422 Andy Ballingall schrieb: > Hello Peter, > > I'm glad it's possible, but I can't see how from the documentation. > > Say if I have a table called 'apples' and a table called 'pears'. > > What would the rule look like that would remap all updates on apples so that > they were applied to pears instead? create rule apples_pears_update as on update to apples do instead update pears set name= NEW.name where id=NEW.id ; test=# select * from apples ; id | name ----+------ 1 | a (1 row) test=# select * from pears ; id | name ----+------ 1 | b (1 row) test=# update apples set name = 'c' where id = 1; UPDATE 1 test=# select * from pears ; id | name ----+------ 1 | c (1 row) http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/rules-update.html HTH, Andreas -- Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds) Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°