X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3709DD445
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:58:05 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 07887-09
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:58:04 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from tigger.fuhr.org (tigger.fuhr.org [63.214.45.158])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB209DD441
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:58:03 -0400 (AST)
Received: from winnie.fuhr.org (winnie.fuhr.org [10.1.0.1])
	by tigger.fuhr.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0D4vv3l010754
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);
	Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:57:59 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from mfuhr@winnie.fuhr.org)
Received: from winnie.fuhr.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by winnie.fuhr.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0D4vuIr088383;
	Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:57:56 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from mfuhr@winnie.fuhr.org)
Received: (from mfuhr@localhost)
	by winnie.fuhr.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0D4vuFc088382;
	Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:57:56 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from mfuhr)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:57:56 -0700
From: Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: John DeSoi <desoi@pgedit.com>,
	"'pgsql-sql@postgresql.org' SQL" <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: info is a reserved word?
Message-ID: <20060113045756.GA88336@winnie.fuhr.org>
References: <304B868D-CE4E-4E43-8B85-4CA238BB0F94@pgedit.com>
	<20060113012932.GA71559@winnie.fuhr.org>
	<21184.1137126088@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <21184.1137126088@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.095 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.095]
X-Spam-Score: 0.095
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200601/58
X-Sequence-Number: 23847

On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 11:21:28PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> plpgsql is not very good about reserving words "minimally", ie, not
> treating a word as a keyword outside the context where the keyword
> is meaningful.
> 
> This could probably be fixed, or at least greatly reduced, with some
> flex/bison hacking.  Anyone up for it?

Possibly.  Would it involve much more than what the main parser's
grammar does with unreserved_keyword and friends?  I suppose this
ought to move to pgsql-hackers.

-- 
Michael Fuhr