X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B40E9DCB0D for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 09:17:31 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05612-05 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 09:17:34 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195B59DCB0B for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 09:17:28 -0400 (AST) Received: from [194.25.154.138] (helo=webserv.wug.de) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu0) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKwh2-1F5jlk0Jj3-0000hd; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 14:17:32 +0100 Received: from kretschmer by webserv.wug.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1F5jlj-0000sm-00 for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 14:17:31 +0100 Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 14:17:31 +0100 From: "A. Kretschmer" To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: new rule syntax? Message-ID: <20060205131731.GA3313@webserv.wug-glas.de> Mail-Followup-To: "A. Kretschmer" , pgsql-sql@postgresql.org References: <43E5E8D2.6020502@lake-lotawana.mo.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43E5E8D2.6020502@lake-lotawana.mo.us> X-DEST: 208 X-MSMail-Priority: High X-Message-Flag: Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds) X-OS: Linux - weil ich es mir Wert bin! X-Info: registrierter Linux-User 97922 http://counter.li.org User-Agent: mutt-ng 1.5.9i (Linux) X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:51ea9561fc3f6d9539a2acd743e4748c X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.214 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.180, MISSING_MIMEOLE=1.394] X-Spam-Score: 1.214 X-Spam-Level: * X-Archive-Number: 200602/39 X-Sequence-Number: 24049 am 05.02.2006, um 6:00:18 -0600 mailte A. R. Van Hook folgendes: > in previous versions (<8.1) the following rule declaration seemed to work > fine > create rule checks_d0 as > on delete to checks > do delete from checkitems > where ckid = checks.ckid; > in 8.1.2 I get > > ERROR: missing FROM-clause entry from table "checks" *untested*: create rule checks_d0 as on delete to checks do delete from checkitems, checks where checkitems.ckid = checks.ckid; Read please: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/release-8-1.html ,---- | add_missing_from is now false by default (Neil) | | By default, we now generate an error if a table is used in a query | without a FROM reference. The old behavior is still available, but the | parameter must be set to 'true' to obtain it. `---- HTH, Andreas -- Andreas Kretschmer (Kontakt: siehe Header) Heynitz: 035242/47215, D1: 0160/7141639 GnuPG-ID 0x3FFF606C http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net === Schollglas Unternehmensgruppe ===