Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982CB9FB308 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:31:54 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 53830-04 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 18:31:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from main2.mycybernet.net (main2.mycybernet.net [209.222.63.140]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276519FB319 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 15:31:34 -0300 (ADT) Received: from 227-54-222-209.mycybernet.net ([209.222.54.227] helo=phlogiston.dydns.org) by main2.mycybernet.net with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GVYIZ-0005Gb-Jd for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 14:50:23 -0400 Received: by phlogiston.dydns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A23924172; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:31:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:31:28 -0400 From: Andrew Sullivan To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Assigning a timestamp without timezone to a timestamp Message-ID: <20061005183128.GD8826@phlogiston.dyndns.org> References: <20061003145134.GA3399@phlogiston.dyndns.org> <8C5B026B51B6854CBE88121DBF097A864DE848@ehost010-33.exch010.intermedia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8C5B026B51B6854CBE88121DBF097A864DE848@ehost010-33.exch010.intermedia.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.135 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200610/62 X-Sequence-Number: 26451 On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 11:04:56AM -0700, Hector Villarreal wrote: > Hi > I am also interested in this type of setup. However, in the example > below > I am a little confused as to why the table entry is 1, -3 The 1 is an artificial key (it's the criterion in the WHERE clause). The -03 is the time zone offset. The most reliable way to handle time zone offsets, I find, is to use the numeric offset from UTC. That's the way PostgreSQL shows them in some cases, too. On my system, for instance, I get this for SELECT now() (at the moment): now ------------------------------- 2006-10-05 14:21:51.507419-04 (1 row) > SELECT a.timestamp::timestamptz from (SELECT '2006-10-03 > 09:00'||"timezone" as timestamp from storetz where id = 1) as a; > timestamp So what this does is SELECT the column named "timestamp" from relation "a" cast to timestamp with time zone (the :: is a shorthand for cast in Postgres) FROM a relation called "a" constituted as (this is that "as a" on the end) SELECT the literal string '2006-10-03 09:00' concatenated to (that's what "||" means) the column "timezone" [and call that whole thing "timestamp" FROM a relation called "storetz" WHERE the storetz row has an id of 1. So, what you get is a timestamp with a time zone that is built up from the combination of a timestamp without time zone and some time zone data that you have. What's _really_ cool in Postgres about the time handling is that you can also change your time zone, and find that the data nicely represents your new time zone too. You can see this in my original example: I was using GMT, but inserted a timestamp in -03. When I selected the answer, though, I got one back in GMT (==UTC). So that's why you see this: > > testing=# SELECT a.timestamp::timestamptz from (SELECT '2006-10-03 > 09:00'||"timezone" as timestamp from storetz where id = 1) as a; > timestamp > ------------------------ > 2006-10-03 12:00:00+00 > (1 row) 2006-10-03 09:00:00-03 == 2006-10-03 12:00:00+00 Hope that helps, A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace. --Philip Greenspun