Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9209FB6E7 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:46:13 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44357-02-3 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:45:53 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from 137086.vserver.de (vs137086.vserver.de [62.75.137.86]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1971C9FB6D0 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:45:39 -0400 (AST) Received: from a-kretschmer.de (p54B3C65B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.179.198.91]) (authenticated bits=0) by 137086.vserver.de (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l1CIjSsB013543 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:45:29 +0100 Received: from kretschmer by a-kretschmer.de with local (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1HGgBQ-0000jH-Tf for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:45:48 +0100 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:45:48 +0100 From: Andreas Kretschmer To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Deadlock on transaction Message-ID: <20070212184548.GA2090@KanotixBox> References: <55c095e90702120943v2909044eo91445b0eda3958c7@mail.gmail.com> <1171302488.3565.15.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> <55c095e90702121008u6d3d27c0m16e52d63f97c3e7d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <55c095e90702121008u6d3d27c0m16e52d63f97c3e7d@mail.gmail.com> X-OS: Debian/GNU Linux - weil ich es mir Wert bin! X-GPG-Fingerprint: EE16 3C01 7B9C 10F7 2C8B 3B86 4DB3 D9EE 7F45 84DA X-Message-Flag: "Windows" is not the answer. "Windows" is the question and the answer is "no"! X-Lugdd: Gerd Kube X-Info: My name is root. Just root. And I am licensed to kill -9 User-Agent: mutt-ng 1.5.9i (Linux) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.212 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL, BAYES_50, FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200702/145 X-Sequence-Number: 27479 Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha schrieb: > I mean really deadlock. Other transactions can't access the database unti= l the > main transaction is complete. A question: That's not true. >=20 > PostgreSQL doesn't permit multiple transactions concurrently ? Why not? Show us a complete case. PG works fine with many users on many connections and many transactions, at the same time. >=20 > Ezequias >=20 > 2007/2/12, Scott Marlowe <_=08s_=08m_=08a_=08r_=08l_=08o_=08w_=08e_=08@_= =08g_=082_=08s_=08w_=08i_=08t_=08c_=08h_=08w_=08o_=08r_=08k_=08s_=08._=08c_= =08o_=08m>: Please, no silly fullquote betlow the answer and no html. --=20 Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds) "If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknow) Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082=B0, E 13.56889=B0