Received: from localhost (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DBB9FB1EC for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:52:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 36462-07 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:52:14 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from main2.mycybernet.net (main2.mycybernet.net [209.222.63.140]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC319FA0DA for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:52:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: from 227-54-222-209.mycybernet.net ([209.222.54.227] helo=phlogiston.dydns.org) by main2.mycybernet.net with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HevP6-000384-MK for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:52:08 -0400 Received: by phlogiston.dydns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3875F404E; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:52:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:52:03 -0400 From: Andrew Sullivan To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: We all are looped on Internet: request + transport = invariant Message-ID: <20070420155203.GA17149@phlogiston.dyndns.org> References: <14110647859.20070413105812@narod.ru> <20070413150936.GA31517@phlogiston.dyndns.org> <1684192906.20070419090827@narod.ru> <20070419134808.GB14187@phlogiston.dyndns.org> <814860828.20070420120819@narod.ru> <4628A08F.9050804@archonet.com> <4635310500.20070420174908@narod.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4635310500.20070420174908@narod.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200704/188 X-Sequence-Number: 28188 On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 05:49:08PM +0300, Dmitry Turin wrote: > I speak about appied specialists (physicists, biologists, etc), which > can NOT do that. > >it's just an afternoon's work > > Not for mentioned people. I think part of the reason I'm sceptical of your plan is that every physicist or biologist I ever knew, who had anything to do with storing large volumes of data, all knew a great deal of Perl. What they didn't know, they got the computer-support staff (that was my job) to build for them. People who work with data have to learn to use the tools for processing it. Nobody ever suggests that stats is just too hard, so we should make an easy-stats course that just covers the teeny bit that (say) biologists need to know. That seems to be what you are suggesting be done to SQL. Now, anyone who knows anything about biology -- or physics, for that matter -- knows that you actually have to have a good handle on stats to do any interesting work. You don't need everything economists use, though, so you don't learn those bits. Similarly, I don't expect a biologist to learn (for instance) the Net::DNS modules for Perl. That doesn't mean they can get away without learning a bit about XML, Perl, and Pg.pm. Anyway, I've said enough on this topic. When you have the start of a user library that implements your proposal, perhaps you can post it to -hackers for the response you'll get there. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca When my information changes, I alter my conclusions. What do you do sir? --attr. John Maynard Keynes