Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6CD9F9943 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:52:15 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48768-10 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:52:00 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A856E9FA439 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:52:06 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [194.25.154.138] (helo=webserv.wug.de) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu8) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML31I-1IWCWZ2jQx-0001Og; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:52:04 +0200 Received: from kretschmer by webserv.wug.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1IWCWZ-0006OB-00 for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:52:03 +0200 Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:52:03 +0200 From: "A. Kretschmer" To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Optimize querry sql Message-ID: <20070914145202.GA24546@a-kretschmer.de> References: <20070914084952.GB7443@a-kretschmer.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: Debian/GNU Linux - weil ich es mir Wert bin! X-Message-Flag: "Windows" is not the answer. "Windows" is the question and the answer is "no"! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18Qjie7VVeVRJUcwfM/W39U8lgq4p8sz816LW+ sJ/qZkyubA9I1W9fqzYBnndf7qLiY02Ne6Jf987wTD7wnpYVDX PX2aIZVVzk07gICngUrAyWDan5wO+V5 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200709/112 X-Sequence-Number: 29325 am Fri, dem 14.09.2007, um 8:36:47 -0500 mailte Scott Marlowe folgendes: > On 9/14/07, A. Kretschmer wrote: > > > And use CURRENT_DATE instead now(). > > Out of curiosity, why the advice to switch from now() to CURRENT_DATE? Mhh, don't know... Andreas -- Andreas Kretschmer Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header) GnuPG-ID: 0x3FFF606C, privat 0x7F4584DA http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net