Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37CF12E3432 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:21:57 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17195-01 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:21:55 -0400 (AST) Received: from df39.dot5hosting.com (df39.dot5hosting.com [72.22.92.64]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E84C2E3424 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 21:16:47 -0400 (AST) Received: (qmail 9340 invoked by uid 3128); 18 Dec 2007 01:21:14 -0000 Received: from 127.0.0.1 by df39.dot5hosting.com (envelope-from , uid 1002) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.88/1245. spamassassin: 3.1.0. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):SA:0(-2.8/5.0):. Processed in 1.487155 secs); 18 Dec 2007 01:21:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO df39.dot5hosting.com.com) (127.0.0.1) by df39.dot5hosting.com with SMTP; 18 Dec 2007 01:21:12 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Describe Table Reply-To: danap@dandymadeproductions.com X-Origin: 216.129.226.21 Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:21:10 -0800 X-Uidl: 119794087093125909 X-Mailer: AtMail 4.03 X-Qmail-Scanner-Message-ID: <11979408729229332@df39.dot5hosting.com> Message-Id: <20071218011647.8E84C2E3424@postgresql.org> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200712/97 X-Sequence-Number: 29789 Thanks guys,=0D That pretty much answers my questions. No there is not=0D an easy way. While the access to a lot of internals to the=0D postgresql database can be advantages it is exactly the=0D kind of thing to break generic code anytime something=0D changes. I think I'll take the harder approach and stick=0D with the standard defined interfaces in java.sql. Did I=0D read this in the manual somewhere? :)=0D =0D MySQLView Project Manager=0D Dana Proctor=0D =0D =0D