From: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak@officenet.no>
Organization: OfficeNet AS
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Slow Query problem
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:26:33 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405)
Cc: "Premsun Choltanwanich" <Premsun@nsasia.co.th>
References: <479DE418.C5F7.004C.0@nsasia.co.th>
In-Reply-To: <479DE418.C5F7.004C.0@nsasia.co.th>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200801281326.33832.andreak@officenet.no>

On Monday 28 January 2008 08:18:24 Premsun Choltanwanich wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am currently using PostgreSQL database version 8.0.13.  My problem
> relates to a slow result when a query using a defined view joins to anoth=
er
> table for a result.
>
> Background:  I have 7 tables of invoice transactions.  The tables are
> slightly different in that they record different data (some different
> columns in each table).  There are about 250,000 records when a union view
> is created.  A simply query on this union performs satisfactorily.
>
> The invoice table union view is then joined with a table of receipts (whi=
ch
> have a total of about 150,000 records).
>
> It takes around 3.5 seconds for "select * from view_transaction where
> member_id =3D 999  and receipt_no is null" (which returns unpaid invoices=
).
>
> By hard coding I created a single table from the 7 invoice tables (instead
> of creating a union) and then used it with receipt table.  This time for
> the same query improved to 1.8 seconds.
>
> To further improve things I tried to code the selection rather than to use
> a view, and so "select * from temp_transaction where member_id =3D 999 and
> receipt_no is null" provided the result in .5 second. (2 records returned
> containing the details of receipt_no, transaction_no, transaction_type,
> transaction_amount, member_id).
>
> I would prefer to be able to have completed the above by using unions and
> views.  Is it possible to do this, or am I better creating a permanent
> table of invoices and writing the query as I did above?
>
> Any comments on this and suggestions would be appreciated.  If there is
> documentation where I can read up please let me have a link.

It is very hard to help without you providing the schema for the tables/vie=
ws=20
involved. It sounds like you don't have any indexes if you experience=20
performance-problems on queries like "select * from view_transaction where=
=20
member_id =3D 999  and receipt_no is null". But again, without the definiti=
on=20
of the view and underlying tables, it's very hard to help.

=2D-=20
Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak@officenet.no>
Senior Software Developer / Manager
=2D-----------------------+---------------------------------------------+
OfficeNet AS            | The most difficult thing in the world is to |
Karenslyst All=C3=A9 11      | know how to do a thing and to watch         |
PO. Box 529 Sk=C3=B8yen      | somebody else doing it wrong, without       |
0214 Oslo               | comment.                                    |
NORWAY                  |                                             |
Tlf:    +47 24 15 38 90 |                                             |
=46ax:    +47 24 15 38 91 |                                             |
Mobile: +47 909  56 963 |                                             |
=2D-----------------------+---------------------------------------------+