Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A033D2E0032 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:23:10 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 91570-04 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:23:09 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B9C02E0038 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:23:09 -0400 (AST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2008 15:23:07 -0000 Received: from xdsl-87-79-142-134.netcologne.de (EHLO colt.pezone.net) [87.79.142.134] by mail.gmx.net (mp022) with SMTP; 17 Feb 2008 16:23:07 +0100 X-Authenticated: #495269 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+D8WMaNoGD8a5miua46j8dotKD8h4E2sqJwB3+4R ElV9Z6AXvL9+2C From: Peter Eisentraut To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Backward compatibility psql 8.1 to 8.2 Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:23:04 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: "Scott Marlowe" , "Bryce Nesbitt" , "Richard Huxton" References: <47B1573C.9070402@obviously.com> <47B66740.3010401@obviously.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200802171623.05274.peter_e@gmx.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200802/141 X-Sequence-Number: 30232 Scott Marlowe wrote: > Does anyone who know about packaging know if this a limitation of the > packaging spec in rpm, or is there a relatively simple way to get an > rpm based machine to run >1 ver of pgsql at a time? The difference is merely that the packaging doesn't support that setup. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/