Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF0E2E0032
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:28:43 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 45943-03 for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:28:39 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
Received: from lou-bada.torma.org (lou-bada.torma.org [213.41.244.89])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A332E0039
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:28:40 -0400 (AST)
Received: from lara.torma.org (helmut.lou-bada.torma.org
	[IPv6:2001:7a8:b459:2:218:deff:fec1:e754])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by lou-bada.torma.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C844C986E7
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:28:37 +0100 (CET)
From: Teemu Torma <teemu@torma.org>
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: duplicate key violates unique constraint
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:28:36 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9
References: <014401c87887$a8fed450$3102a8c0@dream>
	<016401c87891$58237950$3102a8c0@dream>
	<20080226162246.GA9865@crankycanuck.ca>
In-Reply-To: <20080226162246.GA9865@crankycanuck.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200802261728.36773.teemu@torma.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200802/204
X-Sequence-Number: 30295

On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> Well, except that there's no "EXCEPTION" statement in SQL?  I think
> your correspondent was intending for this to be programmatic.

I was thinking pl/pgsql.  

Teemu