Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487DD6321C4 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 05:32:10 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63284-06 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:31:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.9]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A328D6336C3 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 05:31:59 -0300 (ADT) Received: from webserv.wug.de ([194.25.154.138]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LjO9b-1NKeAs1MHX-00dUXP; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:31:57 +0100 Received: from kretschmer by webserv.wug.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1NtzWm-0000rO-00 for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:31:56 +0100 Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:31:56 +0100 From: "A. Kretschmer" To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: ALTER TYPE my_enum AS ENUM ADD ('label10') Message-ID: <20100323083156.GD23688@a-kretschmer.de> References: <48DA836F3865C54B8FBF424A3B775AF6FDE72900@Exchange-Server.scanlab-intern.de> <20100322150515.GI30841@a-kretschmer.de> <48DA836F3865C54B8FBF424A3B775AF6FDE72905@Exchange-Server.scanlab-intern.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48DA836F3865C54B8FBF424A3B775AF6FDE72905@Exchange-Server.scanlab-intern.de> X-OS: Debian/GNU Linux - weil ich es mir Wert bin! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/tlw34oPu03QYFH6r6KHxLsPDVHSRmgb9hhtS I513k3aVv0/lS39X8XGb+i2/saXPttdGiiZsE66kKaJrKh95Q+ jn0JdQTSHj49UY2HvSVCg== X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.599 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201003/169 X-Sequence-Number: 33876 In response to Andreas Gaab : > I tried successfully to directly insert a further entry into table > pg_enum with the corresponding enumtypid. Do you think to directly > manipulate table pg_enum is allowed? It's maybe allowed, but not recommended. It's a system-table, not a user-table. Andreas -- Andreas Kretschmer Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header) GnuPG: 0x31720C99, 1006 CCB4 A326 1D42 6431 2EB0 389D 1DC2 3172 0C99