Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BC643CEB8 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:16:41 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.ringways.co.uk ([77.86.27.30] helo=mail.ringways.co.uk) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rntj9-0007S6-Lv for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:16:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mail.ringways.co.uk) by mail.ringways.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rntiq-0003ol-EA for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:16:17 +0000 Received: from eddie.ringways.co.uk ([10.1.1.115] helo=eddie.ringways.co.uk) by mail.ringways.co.uk with ESMTP id qFGDu8Kp34270; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:16:13 +0000 From: Gary Stainburn Organization: Ringways Garages Ltd To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: date range to set of dates expansion Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:16:16 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <201201190713.34333.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk> <87mx9kks84.fsf@hf.protecting.net> <201201191511.46076.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <201201191511.46076.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201201191516.16802.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk> X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 20401 [Mar 31 2011] X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0285], KAS30/SDK/Release X-Anti-Virus: Kaspersky Mail Gateway, version: 5.6.28/RELEASE, bases: 20110331T110535 #5151353, check: 20120119 clean X-Spam-Score: -51.6 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "ollie.ringways.co.uk", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see Gary Stainburn for details. Content preview: On Thursday 19 January 2012 15:11:46 Gary Stainburn wrote: > I'll be upgrading my live server as soon as possible, but in the meantime > can anyone suggest a way I can do the same thing using Postgresql 8.1 > until I can evaluate 8.4 on my live systems? [...] Content analysis details: (-51.6 points, 15.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -50 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 RING_SAFE RING_SAFE X-Pg-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Archive-Number: 201201/89 X-Sequence-Number: 36260 On Thursday 19 January 2012 15:11:46 Gary Stainburn wrote: > I'll be upgrading my live server as soon as possible, but in the meantime > can anyone suggest a way I can do the same thing using Postgresql 8.1 > until I can evaluate 8.4 on my live systems? Sorry, I meant 8.3 as my current version -- Gary Stainburn Group I.T. Manager Ringways Garages http://www.ringways.co.uk