Received: from magus.postgresql.org (magus.postgresql.org [87.238.57.229]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52E5FAB309 for ; Sat, 26 May 2012 00:29:21 -0300 (ADT) Received: from etc.kandalaya.org ([83.143.86.98] helo=images.kandalaya.org) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SY7KC-0008Mc-Ql for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Sat, 26 May 2012 03:05:56 +0000 Received: from mail.linux-delhi.org (triband-del-59.177.64.214.bol.net.in [59.177.64.214] (may be forged)) by images.kandalaya.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9) with ESMTP id q4Q35VFw011388 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 26 May 2012 08:35:35 +0530 Received: from mail.linux-delhi.org (raju@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linux-delhi.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2) with ESMTP id q4Q2utaG006578 for ; Sat, 26 May 2012 08:27:15 +0530 From: "Raj Mathur (=?utf-8?b?4KSw4KS+4KSc?= =?utf-8?b?IOCkruCkvuCkpeClgeCksA==?=)" Reply-To: raju@linux-delhi.org Organization: Kandalaya To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Flatten table using timestamp and source Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 08:26:54 +0530 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-2-686-pae; KDE/4.6.5; i686; ; ) References: <73a6b75b83b37093e5e2751fc59c4323@mail.gmail.com> <43a608eb27c08adad0ae99c3409eb1fd@mail.gmail.com> <201205251120.46272.raju@linux-delhi.org> In-Reply-To: <201205251120.46272.raju@linux-delhi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201205260826.54985.raju@linux-delhi.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX,LOCAL_FROM_RAJU,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, RCVD_IN_XBL,RDNS_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on images.kandalaya.org X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at images.kandalaya.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201205/92 X-Sequence-Number: 36640 On Friday 25 May 2012, Raj Mathur (=E0=A4=B0=E0=A4=BE=E0=A4=9C =E0=A4=AE=E0= =A4=BE=E0=A4=A5=E0=A5=81=E0=A4=B0) wrote: > On Thursday 24 May 2012, Elrich Marx wrote: > > If source changes, in this case from 1 to 2, then etime would be > > the last value of stime for source =3D1; So for source 1 it starts > > at stime 13:00 and continues till 13:02 (etime). > >=20 > > This should result in 3 records, because source is 1, then 2, then > > 1 again. I hope this explains ? >=20 > I think I understand. Here's a partially working example -- it > doesn't compute the last interval. Probably amenable to some severe > optimisation too, but then I don't claim to be an SQL expert :) With the last interval computation: QUERY =2D---- with first_last as ( select * from ( select source, time, case when lag(source) over (order by time) !=3D source or lag(source) over (order by time) is null then 1 else 0 end as is_first, case when lead(source) over (order by time) !=3D source or lead(source) over (order by time) is null then 1 else 0 end as is_last from p ) foo where is_first !=3D 0 or is_last !=3D 0 ) select t1.source, start_time, end_time from ( select source, time as start_time from first_last where is_first =3D 1 ) t1 join ( select source, time as end_time, is_last from first_last where is_last =3D 1 ) t2 on ( t1.source =3D t2.source and t2.end_time > t1.start_time and ( ( t2.end_time <=20 ( select time from first_last where source !=3D t2.source and time > t1.start_time order by time limit 1 ) ) or ( t1.start_time =3D=20 ( select time from first_last where is_first =3D 1 order by time desc limit 1 ) and t2.end_time =3D ( select time from first_last where is_last =3D 1 order by time desc limit 1 ) ) ) ) ; RESULT (with same data set as before) =2D----- source | start_time | end_time =20 =2D-------+---------------------+--------------------- 1 | 1970-01-01 05:30:01 | 1970-01-01 05:32:01 6 | 1970-01-01 05:33:01 | 1970-01-01 05:37:01 2 | 1970-01-01 05:38:01 | 1970-01-01 05:41:01 6 | 1970-01-01 05:42:01 | 1970-01-01 05:46:01 4 | 1970-01-01 05:47:01 | 1970-01-01 05:51:01 0 | 1970-01-01 05:52:01 | 1970-01-01 05:55:01 7 | 1970-01-01 05:56:01 | 1970-01-01 05:58:01 8 | 1970-01-01 05:59:01 | 1970-01-01 06:03:01 1 | 1970-01-01 06:04:01 | 1970-01-01 06:10:01 8 | 1970-01-01 06:11:01 | 1970-01-01 06:13:01 6 | 1970-01-01 06:14:01 | 1970-01-01 06:16:01 4 | 1970-01-01 06:17:01 | 1970-01-01 06:18:01 9 | 1970-01-01 06:19:01 | 1970-01-01 06:22:01 2 | 1970-01-01 06:23:01 | 1970-01-01 06:25:01 1 | 1970-01-01 06:26:01 | 1970-01-01 06:29:01 4 | 1970-01-01 06:30:01 | 1970-01-01 06:34:01 0 | 1970-01-01 06:35:01 | 1970-01-01 06:37:01 9 | 1970-01-01 06:38:01 | 1970-01-01 06:42:01 1 | 1970-01-01 06:43:01 | 1970-01-01 06:45:01 8 | 1970-01-01 06:46:01 | 1970-01-01 06:50:01 0 | 1970-01-01 06:51:01 | 1970-01-01 06:57:01 2 | 1970-01-01 06:58:01 | 1970-01-01 07:05:01 4 | 1970-01-01 07:06:01 | 1970-01-01 07:07:01 2 | 1970-01-01 07:08:01 | 1970-01-01 07:12:01 7 | 1970-01-01 07:13:01 | 1970-01-01 07:14:01 9 | 1970-01-01 07:15:01 | 1970-01-01 07:17:01 7 | 1970-01-01 07:18:01 | 1970-01-01 07:21:01 Would be interested in seeing how to shorten and/or optimise this query. Regards, =2D- Raj =2D-=20 Raj Mathur || raju@kandalaya.org || GPG: http://otheronepercent.blogspot.com || http://kandalaya.org || CC68 It is the mind that moves || http://schizoid.in || D17F