Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:33:11 -0400
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Charles Sheridan <cesheri@swbell.net>
Cc: Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@infinito.it>,
 "pgsql-sql@postgresql.org" <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: CTAGS for PL/pgSQL ?
Message-ID: <20130829133311.GD27301@momjian.us>
References: <201308281424.r7SEOuhS024110@nlpi165.prodigy.net>
 <521E125C.6050706@swbell.net>
 <CAKoxK+4tXBtZvNddV3pbkvfspk3tT2P0wwEQDe5bBT5K8F0DEg@mail.gmail.com>
 <521F4A0B.3090701@swbell.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <521F4A0B.3090701@swbell.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-sql-owner@postgresql.org

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 08:18:03AM -0500, Charles Sheridan wrote:
> 
> >>Does anyone know if there are any CTAGS extensions or variants that support
> >>PL/pgSQL ?
> >>
> >>I use exuberant-ctags which does not support it, and a web search does not
> >>return anything promising.
> >As far as I know, the quick answer is NO.
> >However I made a few simple tests with etags and it seems to work with
> >plpgsql. However I would expect it to fail for some advanced features.
> >
> >Luca
> >
> Thanks Luca, unfortunately (?) I'm a pretty heavy Vim user, so etags
> is not in my scope.

Uh, I think Vim can use etags, no?  Isn't etags Exuberant Ctags?  The 
Exuberant Ctags's FAQ mentions Vim:

	http://ctags.sourceforge.net/faq.html#11

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


-- 
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql