Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XSP22-0005XS-Bj for pgsql-sql@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:28:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XSP21-0001gY-He for pgsql-sql@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:28:49 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XSP1x-0001Ym-MA for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:28:45 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XSP1t-0002e7-Jb for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:28:43 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XSP1s-0002aG-4i; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 07:28:40 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 07:28:40 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Alvaro Herrera Cc: Bijayalakshmi Swain , "pgsql-sql@postgresql.org" , VFCorpOffshoreTeam Subject: Re: VF0072 - Operating System Compatibility for Application PostgreSQL 8.3 Message-ID: <20140912112840.GA4080@momjian.us> References: <20140912041232.GJ4701@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140912041232.GJ4701@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-sql Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-sql-owner@postgresql.org On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 01:12:32AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bijayalakshmi Swain wrote: > > > As part of planning an operating system upgrade for our customer, we are researching the OS supportability status of one or more of your company's applications. Unfortunately, we could not locate this information on your website. In order to help our joint customer make the most informed decision regarding the supportability of your application in their enterprise, we request your assistance in providing support information on your application as per the details below. > > Is anyone thinking on replying to this? There are three other inquiries > of this nature waiting for moderator approval (for PG 8.1, PG 9.2, and > psqlODBC). Should I just drop them? I have no idea if this stuff is > legit. (pgsql-sql doesn't seem the best place for it, anyhow.) I say just drop it. It feels like some low-level person who has to fill in a spreadsheet for software compatibility. In fact, looking at their email now, it seems they are asking about the Windows builds, so the questions should go to EnterpriseDB, or whoever else is doing Windows builds. I will reply to their earlier request but I don't see how having them repeatedly ask for every version is a good thing. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql