Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d7hAa-0004sI-Mp for pgsql-sql@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 11:49:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d7hAa-0003xc-4V for pgsql-sql@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 11:49:40 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d7hAZ-0003wm-DA for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 11:49:39 +0000 Received: from hub.ringways.co.uk ([88.211.105.30] helo=ringways.co.uk) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d7hAW-0001qG-Eh for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 11:49:38 +0000 Received: from eddie.ringways.co.uk ([10.1.1.115]) by ringways.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1d7hAU-000OIB-2D for pgsql-sql@postgresql.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 12:49:34 +0100 From: Gary Stainburn Organization: Ringways Garages Ltd To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Most recent row Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 12:49:33 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <201705050925.04194.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk> <201705051154.54863.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk> <20170505110939.GB20445@depesz.com> In-Reply-To: <20170505110939.GB20445@depesz.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201705081249.33815.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk> X-KLMS-Rule-ID: 1 X-KLMS-Message-Action: clean X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Lua-Profiles: 112367 [May 08 2017] X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Version: 5.7.0.14 X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Envelope-From: gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Rate: 0 X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Status: not_detected X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Method: none X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Info: LuaCore: 220 220 65c578e4876457a63a6b202c4e3f4a343e1d5003, {msgid_created_by_recepient}, ringways.co.uk:7.1.1;d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e.com:7.1.1;eddie.ringways.co.uk:7.1.1;127.0.0.199:7.1.2,5.2.1;127.0.0.200:5.2.1 X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: scan successful X-KLMS-AntiPhishing: Clean, 2017/05/05 14:11:20 X-KLMS-AntiVirus: Kaspersky Security 8.0 for Linux Mail Server, version 8.0.1.721, bases: 2017/05/08 02:37:00 #9492534 X-KLMS-AntiVirus-Status: Clean, skipped X-Spam-Score: -50.8 (--------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "ollie2.ringways.co.uk", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see Gary Stainburn for details. Content preview: On Friday 05 May 2017 12:09:39 hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > There was this part, but it still doesn't contain information about: To clarify the current situation > - how many assessments per person will there usually be? There will be roughly one assessment per person every 6 months, so initially the count will be low, but will increase over time. As we are still to implement this, the assessment count is zero, although many of the assessments have already been done on paper. Once up to date, everyone should have at least once assessment. [...] Content analysis details: (-50.8 points, 15.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -50 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.1 SCORE_RCPTS Adding score for each recipient -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 RING_SAFE No description available. X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-sql Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-sql-owner@postgresql.org On Friday 05 May 2017 12:09:39 hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > There was this part, but it still doesn't contain information about: To clarify the current situation > - how many assessments per person will there usually be? There will be roughly one assessment per person every 6 months, so initially the count will be low, but will increase over time. As we are still to implement this, the assessment count is zero, although many of the assessments have already been done on paper. Once up to date, everyone should have at least once assessment. > - will you always get data for all people? When a new person is added he will not have an assessment. > - if not (all people) - how many (percent or count)? Once each person has been added, an assessment wil be scheduled for as quickly as possible. As we currently have 720 people, adding 7 more people is only 1% so I should say the percentage will be between 0% and 1% (Once up to date) -- Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql