Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9CB476D12 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 23:33:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399CB476CA8 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 23:33:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gA94XWhR000228; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 23:33:32 -0500 (EST) To: Stephan Szabo Cc: Ludwig Lim , PostgreSQL Mailing List Subject: Re: More than 1 trigger of the same kind In-reply-to: <20021108194914.Q18660-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com> References: <20021108194914.Q18660-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com> Comments: In-reply-to Stephan Szabo message dated "Fri, 08 Nov 2002 19:49:52 -0800" Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 23:33:31 -0500 Message-ID: <227.1036816411@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200211/152 X-Sequence-Number: 10294 Stephan Szabo writes: >> Does having more than 1 trigger of the same kind >> produces some side effect? I mean is the order of the >> trigger firing is always the same? > IIRC the triggers are fired in name order. That's true as of 7.3; I do not think prior versions promised anything about firing order. regards, tom lane