X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240159DC835 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:02:41 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 65120-09 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:02:40 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECCD9DC840 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:02:38 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0QI2cH1022808; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:02:38 -0500 (EST) To: "Daniel Caune" cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HELP] Defining a function as a procedure In-reply-to: <1E293D3FF63A3740B10AD5AAD88535D201663CC5@UBIMAIL1.ubisoft.org> References: <1E293D3FF63A3740B10AD5AAD88535D201663CC5@UBIMAIL1.ubisoft.org> Comments: In-reply-to "Daniel Caune" message dated "Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:09:14 -0500" Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:02:38 -0500 Message-ID: <22807.1138298558@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.099 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.099] X-Spam-Score: 0.099 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/190 X-Sequence-Number: 23979 "Daniel Caune" writes: > Is there a way to define a function as a procedure, I mean a function > that returns nothing. In recent versions you can say RETURNS VOID, which is a bit of a hack but it gets the point across... regards, tom lane