Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992E1637275
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:13:06 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 83105-01-4 for
	<pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:12:53 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30216367A3
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:12:55 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n8BICotf023639;
	Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:12:51 -0400 (EDT)
To: Gerardo Herzig <gherzig@fmed.uba.ar>
cc: postgres list <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: about pg_proc (column pronamespace) 
In-reply-to: <4AAA8F9A.2040903@fmed.uba.ar> 
References: <4AAA8F9A.2040903@fmed.uba.ar>
Comments: In-reply-to Gerardo Herzig <gherzig@fmed.uba.ar>
	message dated "Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:57:46 -0300"
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:12:50 -0400
Message-ID: <23638.1252692770@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.591 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=AWL=0.008,
	BAYES_00=-2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200909/48
X-Sequence-Number: 33113

Gerardo Herzig <gherzig@fmed.uba.ar> writes:
> Obviously im missing something, i cant find any relation between
> pg_proc.pronamespace and pg_namespace.

You didn't look at pg_namespace.oid, which is a "system column"
meaning SELECT * doesn't show it.

			regards, tom lane