Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA9E475EF7 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:57:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B209475CA9 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:57:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g9GDvchR023901; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:57:38 -0400 (EDT) To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Domoszlai_L=E1szl=F3?= Cc: "SQL PostgreSQL (E-mail)" Subject: Re: set difference In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to =?iso-8859-1?Q?Domoszlai_L=E1szl=F3?= message dated "Wed, 16 Oct 2002 15:44:42 +0200" Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:57:37 -0400 Message-ID: <23900.1034776657@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517 X-Archive-Number: 200210/176 X-Sequence-Number: 9893 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Domoszlai_L=E1szl=F3?= writes: > So, do you think a DIFFERENCE or EXCEPT SYMMETRIC clause will be reasonable > feauture for postgresql? I doubt it; haven't heard a request for it before, and AFAICS there's no such thing in the SQL spec... regards, tom lane