X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (developer.postgresql.org [64.117.224.193]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0347EEFEAD for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 13:52:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (svr1.postgresql.org [64.117.224.193]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03672-06 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 13:52:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2533AEFE98 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 13:52:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h56DqPU6025555; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 09:52:25 -0400 (EDT) To: Josh Berkus Cc: "pgsql-sql" Subject: Re: Changing owner of function -- best method? In-reply-to: <200306050806.34172.josh@agliodbs.com> References: <200306050806.34172.josh@agliodbs.com> Comments: In-reply-to Josh Berkus message dated "Thu, 05 Jun 2003 08:06:34 -0700" Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 09:52:25 -0400 Message-ID: <25554.1054907545@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Archive-Number: 200306/50 X-Sequence-Number: 13808 Josh Berkus writes: > A) Updating the pg_proc table to change the function owner; That seems safe enough. regards, tom lane