X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2574D3A62C6 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:00:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 92163-02 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:00:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB983A62A2 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:00:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iBDH0PK8025799; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:00:25 -0500 (EST) To: Christoph Haller Cc: Bruce Momjian , pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Unresolved external: tgetent In-reply-to: <41BD848D.D016BCF1@rodos.fzk.de> References: <200412130313.iBD3Dgp05194@candle.pha.pa.us> <41BD848D.D016BCF1@rodos.fzk.de> Comments: In-reply-to Christoph Haller message dated "Mon, 13 Dec 2004 13:01:17 +0100" Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:00:25 -0500 Message-ID: <25798.1102957225@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.006 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200412/85 X-Sequence-Number: 19705 Christoph Haller writes: > Furthermore, the regression test fails badly on > parallel group (20 tests): point lseg > running forever. The process list shows > ps -fu rodos > UID PID PPID C STIME TTY TIME COMMAND > rodos 14786 6955 228 10:26:43 pts/0 3:08 /bin/sh ./pg_regress > --temp-install --top-builddir=../../.. > rodos 6796 18757 0 10:25:18 pts/0 0:00 gmake check > rodos 14892 14786 0 10:26:46 pts/0 0:00 In other words, the shell is failing to notice that some of its child processes have exited. This is a shell bug; we've seen it before on some platforms (obsolete HPUX versions, in my experience). You can probably work around it by reducing the maximum concurrency setting in the regression script. See the regression test discussion in the administrator's guide. regards, tom lane