X-Original-To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EBAD475DD0
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:43:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E88475D17
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:43:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h1BFhA5u025821;
	Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:43:10 -0500 (EST)
To: "Michael Richards" <michael@fastmail.ca>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: vacuum failure... 
In-reply-to: <3E491044.000001.72557@ns.interchange.ca> 
References: <3E491044.000001.72557@ns.interchange.ca>
Comments: In-reply-to "Michael Richards" <michael@fastmail.ca>
	message dated "Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:01:24 -0500"
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:43:10 -0500
Message-ID: <25820.1044978190@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Archive-Number: 200302/215
X-Sequence-Number: 11613

"Michael Richards" <michael@fastmail.ca> writes:
> ERROR:  No one parent tuple was found

Postgres version?

AFAIR, all known causes of this are fixed in 7.2.4.

			regards, tom lane