X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C74329CAE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:19:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 84298-06 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:19:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C4C329E3A for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:19:41 +0100 (BST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8NGJdDV026991; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:19:39 -0400 (EDT) To: Kemin Zhou Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: plpgsql syntax In-reply-to: <4152ECA2.8030303@ferring.com> References: <4152ECA2.8030303@ferring.com> Comments: In-reply-to Kemin Zhou message dated "Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:32:50 -0700" Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:19:39 -0400 Message-ID: <26990.1095956379@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/207 X-Sequence-Number: 19053 Kemin Zhou writes: > I just want to bring up a point for discussion: > for the function definition is treated as a long string right now. Why > not add an additional token so that we don't have to write 10 single quotes. Something's already been done about this for 8.0. regards, tom lane