X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFFF5E4077
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Sat,  7 Aug 2004 04:09:37 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 27589-02
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Sat,  7 Aug 2004 07:09:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044EC5E4075
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Sat,  7 Aug 2004 04:09:27 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7779S6X027237;
	Sat, 7 Aug 2004 03:09:28 -0400 (EDT)
To: Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon@thenilgiris.com>
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: reply to setting 
In-reply-to: <0408070933080K.01190@thenilgiris.com> 
References: <0408070933080K.01190@thenilgiris.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon@thenilgiris.com>
	message dated "Sat, 07 Aug 2004 09:33:08 +0530"
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 03:09:28 -0400
Message-ID: <27236.1091862568@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200408/48
X-Sequence-Number: 18545

Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon@thenilgiris.com> writes:
> any reason why the default reply-to on this list should not be set to the 
> list? I keep replying to postings only to find later that the reply goes to 
> the OP and not to the list. reply-all button results in needless duplication

It works fine for the rest of us.  Fix your mail software.

			regards, tom lane