X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4AADB72E for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 18:13:33 -0400 (AST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56927-10 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 22:13:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F67DB71D for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 18:13:31 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA1MDUZK028739; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:13:30 -0500 (EST) To: "Mark R. Dingee" Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org, Bruno Wolff III Subject: Re: PGSQL encryption functions In-reply-to: <200511011700.50776.mark.dingee@cox.net> References: <200511011438.06610.mark.dingee@cox.net> <20051101212844.GA24861@wolff.to> <200511011700.50776.mark.dingee@cox.net> Comments: In-reply-to "Mark R. Dingee" message dated "Tue, 01 Nov 2005 17:00:50 -0500" Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 17:13:30 -0500 Message-ID: <28738.1130883210@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.006 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006] X-Spam-Score: 0.006 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200511/14 X-Sequence-Number: 23266 "Mark R. Dingee" writes: > md5 works, but I've been able to > brute-force crack it very quickly, Really? Where's your publication of this remarkable breakthrough? regards, tom lane