X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 519EAD1E29B; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 05:18:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46075-02; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 01:18:32 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA97D1E165; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 01:18:31 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2V5IQHb029097; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:18:26 -0500 (EST) To: josh@agliodbs.com Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org, pgsql-sql@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions In-reply-to: <200403302050.12415.josh@agliodbs.com> References: <200403302050.12415.josh@agliodbs.com> Comments: In-reply-to Josh Berkus message dated "Tue, 30 Mar 2004 20:50:12 -0800" Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:18:26 -0500 Message-ID: <29096.1080710306@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200403/143 X-Sequence-Number: 3962 Josh Berkus writes: > Just got this "do we support it" questionnaire from a signficant commercial > entity vaguely interested in supporting PostrgreSQL. This looks more like an underling with a checklist than a serious inquiry. Can you get them to specify particular capabilities that they need? In sufficient detail that we could actually answer? regards, tom lane