X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE02D1B436
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 28 Nov 2003 19:19:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 82681-07
	for <pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:19:06 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1BAD1B472
	for <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:19:04 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hASJIk19029785;
	Fri, 28 Nov 2003 14:18:47 -0500 (EST)
To: Tomasz Myrta <jasiek@klaster.net>
Cc: Lista dyskusyjna pgsql-sql <pgsql-sql@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: explicit joins wrong planning 
In-reply-to: <3FC63057.3080009@klaster.net> 
References: <3FC63057.3080009@klaster.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Tomasz Myrta <jasiek@klaster.net>
	message dated "Thu, 27 Nov 2003 18:11:51 +0100"
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 14:18:46 -0500
Message-ID: <29784.1070047126@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200311/311
X-Sequence-Number: 16126

Tomasz Myrta <jasiek@klaster.net> writes:
> Postgres doesn't use join on these both fields and doesn't use index 
> scan properly.

Hard to say much when you didn't actually show us the output of EXPLAIN
ANALYZE.

			regards, tom lane