X-Original-To: pgsql-sql-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF6753807 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:51:18 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14617-08 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 15:51:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from a2s1.a2webhosting.com (host-180.a2webhosting.com [69.39.89.180]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6E453761 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:51:14 +0100 (BST) Received: from user-11207sg.dsl.mindspring.com ([66.32.31.144] helo=[192.168.1.10]) by a2s1.a2webhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.44) id 1DKIEr-0005xv-Kn; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 11:51:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <762e5c0504090843121e087c@mail.gmail.com> References: <004b01c53c72$5e4c6390$797ba8c0@jfradkin> <177B93D9-A908-11D9-92FA-000A95B03262@pgedit.com> <762e5c0504090843121e087c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <32472AF2-A90F-11D9-92FA-000A95B03262@pgedit.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Joel Fradkin , pgsql-sql@postgresql.org, Scott Marlowe , Andrew Sullivan , Tom Lane From: John DeSoi Subject: Re: getting count for a specific querry Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:51:11 -0400 To: Bob Henkel X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - a2s1.a2webhosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - postgresql.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - pgedit.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.009 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200504/134 X-Sequence-Number: 21027 On Apr 9, 2005, at 11:43 AM, Bob Henkel wrote: > Forms also offers a button that say get hit count. So if you really > need to know the record count you can get it without moving off the > current record. That's a good idea too. Maybe in my interface you could click on the ? to get the count without changing the rows you are viewing. John DeSoi, Ph.D. http://pgedit.com/ Power Tools for PostgreSQL