Received: from smtp0.mindspring.com (smtp0.mindspring.com [207.69.200.30])
	by hub.org (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA29244
	for <pgsql-sql@hub.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 21:33:33 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from clark.evans@manhattanproject.com)
Received: from manhattanproject.com (pool-209-138-0-205.nwrk.grid.net
	[209.138.0.205])
	by smtp0.mindspring.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA26032;
	Tue, 9 Mar 1999 21:33:26 -0500 (EST)
Sender: clark@mindspring.com
Message-ID: <36E5D919.15D11C54@manhattanproject.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 02:29:45 +0000
From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.0.36 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tim Perdue <perdue@raccoon.com>
CC: pgsql-sql@hub.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Performance
References: <001701be6a95$f0aeee20$0b8c5aa5@timnt.weather.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Tim Perdue wrote:
> BELIEVE IT OR NOT, PostgreSQL is handling 1.8GB in just one table, and its
> performance is amazing. I have archived 1,100,000 emails in the database and
> I don't really see much slowdown yet.

What is your hardware, os, etc?

Thanks!

Clark Evans